The O(n) Club: Pascal’s Triangle — Why Is Everything a 1?

The O(n) Club: Pascal’s Triangle — Why Is Everything a 1?

⚡ TL;DR

Pascal’s Triangle is that legendary integer pyramid where each number (except those lovely edge 1s) is just the sum of the two numbers diagonally above. No shortcuts, no magic O(1) hackery—just straight-up summing in O(n²) time. Here’s the Java for that last-resort caffeine night:

// Classic brute force — turns coffee into triangles
public List<List<Integer>> generate(int numRows) {
    List<List<Integer>> triangle = new ArrayList<>();
    for (int i = 0; i < numRows; i++) {
        List<Integer> row = new ArrayList<>();
        for (int j = 0; j <= i; j++) {
            if (j == 0 || j == i) { row.add(1); }
            else { row.add(triangle.get(i-1).get(j-1) + triangle.get(i-1).get(j)); }
        }
        triangle.add(row);
    }
    return triangle;
}

🧠 How Devs Usually Mess This Up

Optimist mode: “Can’t we generate the triangle with better than O(n²)?” Nope! You have to fill every cell. Others try to reuse the row list for every row—congrats, every row now looks the same (and wrong). And let’s not talk about people who forget to slap a 1 at each end. For the love of combinatorics, don’t mutate lists in-place and expect a miracle. This is not the binomial coefficient function—it builds all rows.

🔍 What’s Actually Going On

Picture a chef: the first and last 1s in each row are the crusty edges of our triangle baguette. The stuff in the middle? It’s fresh—made by combining ingredients (adjacent numbers above) to concoct new values. Each cook (iteration) only gets to see last night’s leftovers (the previous row). No magic fridge, just resourceful summing. It’s what makes Pascal’s triangle the binomial coefficients playground. Need a probability or a render for digital fonts? You’re likely biting into some triangle somewhere.

🛠️ PseudoCode

  • Start with an empty triangle: List<List<Integer>> triangle = new ArrayList<>();
  • For each row i from 0 to numRows - 1:
    • Make a new row: List<Integer> row = new ArrayList<>();
    • For each column j in 0 to i:
      • If j == 0 or j == i, add 1.
      • Else, add previous row’s j-1 and j together.
    • Add your shiny new row to the triangle.
  • Return the whole triangle.

💻 The Code

public List<List<Integer>> generate(int numRows) {
    List<List<Integer>> triangle = new ArrayList<>();
    for (int i = 0; i < numRows; i++) {
        List<Integer> row = new ArrayList<>();
        for (int j = 0; j <= i; j++) {
            if (j == 0 || j == i) {
                row.add(1);
            } else {
                int aboveLeft = triangle.get(i - 1).get(j - 1);
                int aboveRight = triangle.get(i - 1).get(j);
                row.add(aboveLeft + aboveRight);
            }
        }
        triangle.add(row);
    }
    return triangle;
}

⚠️ Pitfalls, Traps & Runtime Smacks

  • List Copying: Never reuse the same row object. Your triangle will be haunted by ghost references.
  • Edge 1s: Every row must start and end with 1, or your interview triangle turns into a parallelogram (which, let’s face it, nobody asked for).
  • Complexity Panic: Full triangle means O(n²) for both time and space. If your interviewer wants one row, that’s a different game. For the whole triangle, this is as good as it gets.
  • Integer Overflows: At big rows (think row 30+), even Java’s Integer might tap out if you’re printing everything.

🧠 Interviewer Brain-Tattoo

“If you try to optimize the unavoidable, you’ll just optimize your own confusion. When in doubt, paint the pyramid—brick by brick.”

Previous Article

The Mutex Club: Writing Your Own Thread Barrier

Next Article

The Mutex Club: Getting Things Done with Future and Callable