The O(n) Club: Partition to K Equal Sum Subsets Without Losing Sanity
⚡ TL;DR
Divide an array into k non-empty groups with equal sums. If
sum(nums) % k != 0
or any number is bigger than the target, save yourself the headache and bail immediately.
When in doubt, backtrack—Java style:public boolean canPartitionKSubsets(int[] nums, int k) { int sum = 0; for (int n : nums) sum += n; if (sum % k != 0) return false; // Now for the real circus: backtracking... }
🧠 How Devs Usually Mess This Up
If you like chasing bugs, ignore these classics:
- Backtracking bravely, without checking whether
sum(nums)
divides evenly intok
. Nothing says ‘Sunday wasted’ like an impossible state. - Missing that any number greater than the target means failure. No, Java can’t shrink a 10 into a 5 by “creative” casting.
- Fixating on the actual partitions, not just whether it’s possible. Just tell your PM if it can be done, not which intern is on which team.
🔍 What’s Actually Going On
Pretend you’re splitting an overstuffed piñata’s loot among k impatient kids. Every kid wants the same amount or they riot.
You get one shot: if the loot divides clean, and none of it’s too chunky, you’re golden. Otherwise, have fun with chaos.
This is the classic
Partition problem, but with a multipack. Before you spiral into recursive misery:
🛠️ PseudoCode
- Pre-check: Save future-you hours
int sum = total(nums); if (sum % k != 0) return false;
If it doesn’t divide, you’re done.
- Size matters
int target = sum / k; for (int n : nums) if (n > target) return false;
No oversized candies in the bucket, please.
- Sort for easier fails
Arrays.sort(nums); reverse(nums);
Tackle big numbers first—fail fast, nap sooner.
- Backtracking with buckets
boolean backtrack(nums, used, k, sum, idx, target) { // If all but one bucket is full, relax // Try placing nums[idx] into any bucket // Undo if it doesn't fit, try next }
Classic fill, undo, repeat cycle (also known as debugging in production).
💻 The Code
public boolean canPartitionKSubsets(int[] nums, int k) {
int sum = 0;
for (int n : nums) sum += n;
if (sum % k != 0) return false;
int target = sum / k;
Arrays.sort(nums);
int n = nums.length;
// Reverse for descending order
for (int i = 0, j = n - 1; i < j; i++, j--) {
int t = nums[i]; nums[i] = nums[j]; nums[j] = t;
}
if (nums[0] > target) return false;
boolean[] used = new boolean[n];
return backtrack(nums, used, k, 0, 0, target);
}
private boolean backtrack(int[] nums, boolean[] used, int k, int bucket, int start, int target) {
if (k == 1) return true;
if (bucket == target) return backtrack(nums, used, k - 1, 0, 0, target);
for (int i = start; i < nums.length; i++) {
if (used[i] || bucket + nums[i] > target) continue;
used[i] = true;
if (backtrack(nums, used, k, bucket + nums[i], i + 1, target)) return true;
used[i] = false;
if (bucket == 0) break;
}
return false;
}
⚠️ Pitfalls, Traps & Runtime Smacks
- Skipping divisibility check: Leads to existential debugging crises.
- Letting big numbers in: Spoiler alert: they never fit.
- Not sorting: You’ll backtrack way more than your laptop’s fan can handle. Always sort descending.
- Overcomplicating with fancy DP: If n ≤ 16, standard backtracking’s fine. Your interviewers secretly hope you won’t bitmask yourself into a corner—unless you WANT style points.
- Time & space: Worst-case is O(k × n × 2n). It’s fine if you don’t invite too many numbers to the party.
🧠 Interviewer Brain-Tattoo
“Always check if your buckets are leak-proof before you pour in the numbers, or you’ll be debugging your own tears by 2AM.”